キャントリルのラダーの問題点

図5 A nice house job Nice House * mental_health physical health mental good_health good health worry Mental Health able afford Good Health * close family_good friends loving Loving Friends * successful wealth wealthy rich Able to Pay ** spending work balance work_life Power & Wealth Work-Life Balance ** time time_family family day life new things goals future *** Spending Time ** life positive enjoying Enjoying Life ** fulfilling feeling relationships mind Fulfilling Relationships ** -0.8 -0.7 -0.6 -0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 ←Cantril Ladder Difference in topic expression (Cohen's d) Harmony→ B opportunity freedom happy educated financial wealthy enjoying loving supportive lucky ones day activities peace relationship inefficient friends lucky perfect settled great success job friends complete finances new self love friendship debt afford owing savings bills everything physically environment class owning plenty best big power privileged top wealth luxury want comfortably property paying independent rich large elite money high need excellent able lots house joy positive forward partner peaceful life others mental relationships close family time feeling marriage housing country ability enough able pay income successful ←Cantril Ladder Harmony→ C Word responses with the highest log odds (in the logistic regression) Cantril Ladder Harmony Rich, Network connections, Privileged, Wealthy, Upper class -4.58 Peace, Prosperity, Tolerance, Love, Understanding 2.82 Privileged, Excess wealth, Independent, Connected, Powerful -4.44 Love, Safety, Comfort, Warmth, Peace 2.68 Successful, Wealthy, Privileged, Educated, Elite -4.34 No worries, Good health, Family time, Stress free, Good weather 2.54 図4 Cantril Ladder [10% 13% 28% 19% 30% Cantril no ladder 2% 8% 27% 22% 40% Cantril no bottom/top 3% 5% 25% 27% 40% Happiness 4% 7% 21% 28% 40% Harmony 6% 5% 22% 22% 45% 0 25 50 75 100 Percentage 10 9 8 7 <7 好ましいレベルの分布。図に示すのは、好みのレベルの分布である；7点以下ではすべて1色にグループ分けされた。カントリル梯子と他のすべての条件との間の差は、一対のウィルコクスン順位和検定（すべてp<0.001多重比較調整済み、r=0.16-19）と、年齢、性別、主観的社会的地位で調整した推定限界平均の一対t検定（すべてp<0.001多重比較調整済み、d=0.27-0.39、詳細は「統計分析」の項を参照）の両方で統計的に有意であった。 図1 Condition Anchors Data Cantril Ladder Bottom to top, best life Self-reported score Cantril Bottom to top, best life Preferred score No ladder Cantril Best life Free text response about interpretation No bottom/top of scale anchors N = 1,581 UK adults Vs. via Prolific Randomized Happiness Happiest life Language Analyses Harmony Harmonious life Dictionaries Topics Embeddings 研究デザインの概要